<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redmond Developer News: Open Source .NET Projects Getting Cold Shoulder?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/2008/04/15/open-source-dot-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/2008/04/15/open-source-dot-net/</link>
	<description>Blogging new enterprise software, mashups, and the application integration platform we develop: Deki Wiki.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Fulkerson</title>
		<link>http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/2008/04/15/open-source-dot-net/#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Fulkerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/?p=415#comment-1725</guid>
		<description>MindTouch has made several contributions to the MySQL .NET connector, SGML Reader, and we work closely with the mono team. Also, I think it's important to note MindTouch released the source code to the MindTouch Desktop Connector that allows you to drag/drop files and entire directory structures to a Deki Wiki instance via a Windows client. Steve makes a great point about how we try our best to make our work reusable by others. I think this is very important because more open source and reusable .NET components are so critically important to the overall ecosystem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MindTouch has made several contributions to the MySQL .NET connector, SGML Reader, and we work closely with the mono team. Also, I think it&#8217;s important to note MindTouch released the source code to the MindTouch Desktop Connector that allows you to drag/drop files and entire directory structures to a Deki Wiki instance via a Windows client. Steve makes a great point about how we try our best to make our work reusable by others. I think this is very important because more open source and reusable .NET components are so critically important to the overall ecosystem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bjorg</title>
		<link>http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/2008/04/15/open-source-dot-net/#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bjorg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/?p=415#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>For the same reason we don't use db4o.  It simply didn't fit our needs.  Deki Wiki includes several open source .Net components, including the MySql .Net connector, SgmlReader, Lucene .Net, and of course Mono.  For each project, we contribute back where we can.  Furthermore, we make a conscious effort to split our own work into reusable components, such as Dream and soon the DekiScript runtime.  I think our work and involvement speaks for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the same reason we don&#8217;t use db4o.  It simply didn&#8217;t fit our needs.  Deki Wiki includes several open source .Net components, including the MySql .Net connector, SgmlReader, Lucene .Net, and of course Mono.  For each project, we contribute back where we can.  Furthermore, we make a conscious effort to split our own work into reusable components, such as Dream and soon the DekiScript runtime.  I think our work and involvement speaks for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knocte</title>
		<link>http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/2008/04/15/open-source-dot-net/#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>knocte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/?p=415#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>I think the first ones that should care about this is not Microsoft, but the community itself. How much reusability do we have in these projects? Should we assume the excessive diversity? Why do you, for example, don't use NHibernate with DekiWiki?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the first ones that should care about this is not Microsoft, but the community itself. How much reusability do we have in these projects? Should we assume the excessive diversity? Why do you, for example, don&#8217;t use NHibernate with DekiWiki?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iknown</title>
		<link>http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/2008/04/15/open-source-dot-net/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>Iknown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/?p=415#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>I known what you are doing. xkcd.com only delivers its humor on Mon, Wen, and Fri so you're trying to fill in the blanks:

"However, I expect to see a growing affinity to open source from Microsoft and, unlike some who are sporting tin foil hats, I do not believe this is caused by nefarious machinations."

Hahahahahaha.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I known what you are doing. xkcd.com only delivers its humor on Mon, Wen, and Fri so you&#8217;re trying to fill in the blanks:</p>
<p>&#8220;However, I expect to see a growing affinity to open source from Microsoft and, unlike some who are sporting tin foil hats, I do not believe this is caused by nefarious machinations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hahahahahaha&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
